|Chess set in the "Régence" style which was standard in France in the 18th and 19th century. The design was possibly that of the furniture make Charles Cressent (1685-1768). See http://ccifrance.com/77.html|
Of all the Enlightenment lovers of the game, it was Jean-Jacques Rousseau who was the most enthusiastic chess player. According to the Confessions he was introduced to the chess at Chambéry, during his séjourn with Madame de Warens, in about 1737 by a Genevan called Gabriel Bagueret who had perhaps been employed by Peter the Great as a secret agent - according to Rousseau ,he was a "rogue" and one of the biggest fools he had ever met:
He got the idea of proposing to teach me chess, which he could play a little. I tried almost against my will, and after i had more or less learned the moves, my progress was so rapid that before the end of our first sitting I could give him the rook which at first he had given me.
Rousseau being Rousseau, he instantly became a chess fanatic, bought himself a board and a copy of Gioachino Greco's manual and sat up night and day committing chess moves to memory. He relates that, nonetheless, when he went to the local café, he was repeatedly beaten by Bagueret:
Every time I have tried to practise by studying games with Philidor's book or Stamma's the same thing has happened to me; I have completely worn myself out and found my play weaker than before. For the rest, whether I have given up chess for a time or kept myself in practice by playing, I have never improved a jot since that first sitting; I have always found myself just where I was when I got up from it. I might practise for thousands of centuries, and at the end I should be capable of giving Bagueret his rook, but that is all. Time well spent, do you think?
Confessions Book 5 (Penguin Classics ed. p.211)
Rousseau - chess champion in the making
In 1742 Rousseau came to Paris with the hope of making his fortune with a new scheme of musical notation and, when, that fell through, briefly fancied he could make a name for himself as a chess player. He seems to have played chiefly not at the Régence, but at the Café Maugis in the rue Saint-Séverin (remembered today only because it featured in a police report).
There I made the acquaintance of M. de Légal, of M. Husson, of Philidor, and of all the great chess players of that time, without however improving my game thereby. But I had no doubt that in the end I should be better than any of them; and that, in my opinion, would a sufficient resource."
Confessions Book 7 (Penguin Classics ed. p.271)
The over-confident Rousseau's potential career as a chess player was cut mercifully short when he left for Venice in 1743 as secretary to the French ambassador.
On his return in 1745 Rousseau turned once more to music and managed to fall out with the amicable Philidor who arranged his opera, Les Muses galantes, for performance in the private theatre of the financier La Pouplinière at Passy. The work was a disaster, though Grimm admired Philidor's overture. Family tradition has it that Philidor conscientiously wrote his musical accompaniment to showcase Rousseau's melodies,but the score has long since disappeared. Rousseau jealously disparaged his contribution and complained that Philidor failed to commit himself to the work.(Allen Life of Philidor p.14-17)
Rousseau beats Diderot at chess
When Rousseau played against Diderot at the Café Maugis, it was invariably Rousseau who won. Diderot - unlike Rousseau - took defeat in good part:
Man strives for superiority, even in the smallest things. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who always beat me at chess, refused to give me a handicap to make the game more equal. "Does it upset you to lose?"he asked me. "No," I said, "but I would make a better defense, and you would enjoy the game more." "That may be, "he replied."All the same, let's leave things as they are".
An acquaintance who lost even when Rousseau conceded the rook, received a similar rebuff; Rousseau refused to increase the handicap, admitting simply "I like to win".
A match against the prince de Conti
|The game of chess between Rousseau and the prince de Conti.|
Engraving after M. Leloir, from a 1889 edition of the Confessions, .(Musée Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Montmorency)
"Nevertheless, despite the gestures and grimaces of the Chevalier and the attendants, which I pretended not to see, I won the two games that we played. As we finished I said to him in a respectful but serious voice: 'My lord, I honour your most Serene Highness too deeply not to beat you on all occasions at chess.' That great prince, who had real wit and knowledge, and indeed deserved to be spared from flattery, really felt - or at least I though so - that I was the only person there who treated him as a man, and I have every reason to believe that he was truly grateful to me for it." (p.501-2)
Jean-Jacques's comments to Conti have sometimes been dismissed as apocryphal but in a letter to Pierre-Alexandre Du Peyrou dated 27th September 1767 he told the same story: he beat Conti three times in a row while the prince's entourage looked on, grimacing like men possessed; he remarked to the prince that he respected him too much not to beat him all the time.
Thus is Rousseau credited with courage in speaking truth to power, though the cynical might suspect a baser motive - Rousseau could not resist the chance to win!
Rousseau continued to enjoy chess throughout his life. In a letter to M de Saint-Germain, dated 26th February 1770, he confirmed that he did not gamble but still liked to play chess. When he returned to Paris in 1770, Grimm noted in the Correspondance littéraire that Rousseau showed himself "several times" at the Café de la Régence, but such crowds gathered that the police warned him off from appearing in public. Nonetheless,at the Régence as at the Procope, Rousseau and Voltaire's customary tables were long remembered. According to one chess commentator in 1836, their places had until recently been indicated to waiters with the command to "serve Jean-Jacques" and "serve Voltaire".
What was Rousseau like as a chess player?
The jury is out on Rousseau's actual abilities as a chess player, and is likely to remain so.
Vast amounts of ink have been spilled over accounts of the supposed game play of the match with Conti and of another game, which Rousseau lost to the abbé Jean-Joseph-Thérèse Roman at Môtiers (preserved in the abbé's splendid chess-themed poem Les Echecs of 1762). According to the chess historian H.J.M. Murray both are spurious; the first derives from a manuscript concerning the games of the Spaniard Busnardo, the second is a Greco game and a literary forgery. We can only fall back on Rousseau's own assessment that, although he entertained the possibility of becoming a serious player, he lacked the ability to master complex strategies in the abstract. One observer reported that Rousseau considered his moves carefully but then played quickly in a state of great excitement. This fits with his personality. We may surmise that he was a competent player but that he lacked the patience and the calculating brain of a Philidor.
Edward Winter, "Jean-Jacques Rousseau and chess" Chess notes [Chess History Center] updated 9/04/2011
Bill Wall, "Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Eugene Rosseau" post on Chess history forum, Chess.com